| Posted at 7:35 PM on Jun 18, 2008 by concernedcitizen, #31512 |
i called merck this week to report matts side effects, the rep was so nice and took all the information, she asked if they could contact our doctor, then she asked if matt had recieved any follow up blood tests???????This is now bothering me maybe i should have questioned that question more instead of saying no????
You are brave to report your story to Merck. Many people are so leary of drug companies these days because of how out of control their advertising and marketing policies are.
The best way for me to make my point is to invent a story about a hypothetical drug to use as an example.
Let's say that I was a researcher who wanted to find a way to help people with asthma knowing that about 10% of the population suffers from asthma. Then from data, I knew that fungus such as aspergillus was found in many asthma cases and that asthma was associated with the presence of hyper-reactive airways with unusually large numbers of eosinophil populations. So then, I hypothetized that eosinophils would not present themselves unless the area of infection was deprived of nitric oxide and eosinophils had to come to the rescue to provide a much, much more serious defense against invading organisms. If the airway is over-reactive due to hyper-sensitivity, then the presence of an over-abundance of eosinophils would cause significant inflammation to the airway tissue.
So I started with that and tried to figure out the pathways. Okay, arginine is the source of nitric oxide production. Micro-organisms are very good at finding ways to defend themselves against their host's defence mechanisms. There are organisms that chemically disable arginine so that it cannot be used to produce nitric oxide. And, there are viruses that consume it and use it to replicate. So I knew that I cannot do anything with arginine because the asthma patient probably has some kind of a problem going that with arginine that I wouldn't want to make worse. So my idea was to invent a NITRIC OXIDE DONOR drug and deliver a source of nitric oxide right to the area of inflammation. The presence of nitric oxide would then down-regulate all of the processes that summon the eosinophils and their count would go down dramatically.
So my idea worked. I located the receptors that communicated with the eosinophils. By using aspergillus as a receptor agonists, I identified that dipicolinic acid pyridine 2,6 dicarboxylic acid which is found on the spore case activated the cysLT1 receptor. By knowing what activated a receptor, I tried similar molecular structures such as quinolines to see if it would bind to the receptor but not activate it. Then I structured the molecule to use the volatile quinoline nitrogen as the source of nitric oxide. A low dose of nitric oxide goes a long way not much is needed so 10 mg. worked fine.
My hypothetical drug would work fine if the patient had the same profile as the model for the drug and the patient was properly monitored. But for my hypothetical drug, the doctors would need to know absolutely everything about the profile of the model so that people who did not fit the profile wouldn't be subjected to unnecessary risks and adverse side effects. My drug would require genetic testing for best results.
My hypothetical drug would not ever be selected for marketing by a pharmaceutical company because it would not be the kind of block buster that they want. My drug would probably only work for about 40% of asthma patients. My drug also should not be used for extended periods of time but only to control episodes of excess eosinophils. Pharmaceutical companies don't want to tell doctors how drugs work these days. Look at how many times, they say that they don't know exactly how it works. OF COURSE, THEY KNOW HOW IT WORKS. These companies think that we are idiots. They just don't want doctors to second guess who the drug won't work for. And, they just don't want doctors to second guess what kind of adverse side effects to expect. My hypothetical drug would never be marketed by any pharmaceutical company these days because it couldn't be turned over to a Madison Avenue advertising company to run a promotional campaign like they are selling potato chips.
adr report myocardial infarction nervous system disorders balance disorder pain 13 cardiac disorders abnormal behaviour sleep disorder drug interaction montelukast chest discomfort granulomatous pruritus myalgia somnolence convulsion muscle spasms psychiatric disorders abdominal pain blood tests merck asthma patient hypothetical drug asthma cases micro organisms defence mechanisms receptors fungus inflammation eosinophils large numbers pathways asthma abundance researcher populations viruses arginine presence population